http://www.rockfax.com/databases/results_area.html?id=1013 World Rock Climbing Information. daily 2 2013-04-12T18:11+00:00 2013-04-12T18:11+00:00 Copyright (c) 2013 ROCKFAX Ltd Rockfax (mailto:info@rockfax.com) http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28378 David Smith 2013-04-12T18:11+00:00 Nice route. More like 6b, and needs extra gear between bolt 3 and 4 unless you enjoy runout 6a climbing above a ledge. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28294 peter myers 2013-03-19T19:13+00:00 You DO get down from the top on a 60m rope. If the belayer is clipped to the bolt at the belay ledge. The climber lands on the same ledge with a metre or 2 to spare. I have done this twice with 2... http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28882 Charles Moreton 2013-03-18T16:47+00:00 6a perhaps; not 6a+ & nowhere near 6b! http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28885 Charles Moreton 2013-03-15T18:22+00:00 Going low when spanning across at the crux worked for me http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28890 Cruxler 2013-03-14T12:43+00:00 Harder than 5+. The Line is not correct on Topo in Rockfax. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=29251 Cruxler 2013-03-14T12:31+00:00 Now it is harder than 5+, maybe even more pieces has fallen http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28239 Cruxler 2013-03-14T12:12+00:00 Now, the bolts are missing in the middle section! http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28718 ploeki 2013-03-13T21:34+00:00 I can confirm the comments on the two new routes right of "the rib". In the first route the bolts are spaced significantly further appart than typical in El Chorro. There are lots of crags,... http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28160 Tim Waterhouse 2013-03-08T18:18+00:00 No distinct crux unlike the previous two routes, but some sustained and precarious padding higher up. 6a-ish? Why these routes get a pumpy symbol I do not know - it's a slab. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28159 Tim Waterhouse 2013-03-08T18:14+00:00 One hard move to pass first bolt - desperate rather than delicate I thought, perhaps easier for the tall - then a romp to the top. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28158 Tim Waterhouse 2013-03-08T18:11+00:00 First bolt on this and next two routes is not high - perhaps one has been added since publication. One tricky move at first bolt, then a romp. 6a-ish? http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28239 Tim Waterhouse 2013-03-01T11:39+00:00 Backed off this as there seems to be a bolt missing, maybe due to rockfall? The run-out might be protectable with a nut or two. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28282 Tim Waterhouse 2013-03-01T11:30+00:00 Badly polished? Nonsense. I'd say 6a+ is not unreasonable, but whatever the grade this is a brilliant route in a fantastic situation. http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28908 Nick Hinchliffe 2013-02-22T15:28+00:00 Update says some routes may have been de bolted, sector escalope is all bolted up fine, there are a couple of routes up and left of this area where there are belays but no bolts and it may be these... http://www.rockfax.com/databases/r.php?i=28890 Nick Hinchliffe 2013-02-22T15:24+00:00 Yup, it's way harder than 4, I lowered off a move about halfway that was harder than any of the 5 + s we did, and it's not totally clear if I was even on the right route, this sector would benefit...